Posts

Showing posts from September, 2021

Pieces

The list of  Questions [ UPDATE : All questions are being re-worded or re-phrased as needed to maintain the original meaning and intent but completely obscure those allegedly referenced until such time as it's needed to be known. Care is also being taken to ensure each post's presentation remains unchanged as well.  This is not an attempt to "fix" anything which may have been incorrect or change the way any post is perceived.  Should anyone have cause to find fault with an update, please state exactly that and why so it can be addressed.  The comments section is completely open but like everyone else on the planet I can guarantee no privacy for anything communicated whether public or private.  11-12-2021 ] [ UPDATE : Close to all the questions have an answer.  Will be updating each posted question with an answer (potential answer) before re-posting. ]    The answers I've trying to find are now separate from the original blog.  As important as they seem to me they

Question of the day 2021-11-12

Image
The list of  Questions [ UPDATE : This question was originally posted on 09-20-2021, then moved back to draft for privacy considerations.  It's become more relevant since then so updated and re-posted. ] 11-12-2021   Does anyone kn ow t he correct way to deal with threatening texts when the identity of the sender is unknown?    Can an incident as described below be explained to a police officer and pass their "litmus test" for deciding whether to allow a police report to be filed?    Simply blocking all texts from the number used can be done, but it doesn't solve the problem.  Prior incidents were the source was simply blocked resulted in similar messages from a different source.  It's preferable to identify and stop the individual(s) responsible in a way that's meaningfully permanent.    Assume the following allegations can be considered reasonably confirmed: The phone the texts were allegedly composed on is owned by Individual #1. The phone number the texts